OUTLIINE
1. Russia within
the International Trade System ……………………………3
2. Regulation of
External Economic Activities………………………………..4
3. Foreign Trade
Pattern……………………………………………………….6
1.
Russia and the international trade system
According to a medium-term forecast
for developments in the area of the international economy, business revival is
cumulating momentum after the recession it experienced in early 1990s. It had a
relevant effect on the world trade. In 1994 the average international trade
turnover showed a 9.5 percent growth being a record figure in the last 20 years
and by 3 times exceeding the increase in the international production. In 1995
the World Trade Organization estimated 8 percent increase in trade turnover as
compared with a 3 percent growth in the world production. World Bank experts
think that in the next 10 years an average increase in foreign trade will make
6 percent annually.
An economic
run-up in most industrialized countries was followed by a growing demand for
many products and a consecutive price hike on international markets.
Oil markets
showed a balance of demand and supply in 1995. Average prices of Dubai oil were
at $ 123 per metric ton, by 14.9 percent exceeding 1994 averages. Owning to small
increase in the world oil consumption and practically unchanged supply
situation no perceptible change of prices is expected.
A trend of
natural gas prices on markets in Western Europe was practically the same as the
oil price dynamics. In 1995 average prices were by 13.4 percent higher as
compared with 1994.
Prices of
nonferrous metals have risen dramatically. In 1995 average world prices were as
follows: aluminum -- $ 1806 per metric ton (20.3 percent rise in comparison
with 1994), copper -- $ 2933 (higher by 23.3 percent), nickel -- $ 8063 (19.3
percent growth).
As a result of
the 1994-95 record price surge in the whole period after the World War II
cellulose joined the leaders with a 50 percent price hike (up to more than $
1000 per metric ton). According to a middle-range outlook price stabilization
accompanied by a slight price rise is expected.
As market
relations develop, process of internal price structure formation continues in
Russia and it gradually closes to the price system existing on world markets.
In 1995 contract prices grew perceptibly, however, prices of a majority of
energy resources lagged behind those on the world trade markets in terms of
rates of increase. The outcome was a worsening balance between contract and
world prices.
An important
role in development of the international trade is played by the GATT/WTO which
for 48 years tried to work out the fundamentals of a future world trade basing
on principles of observance of the Agreement's general regulations aimed to
keep up non-discrimination of individual states and to a gradual elimination of
barriers slowing down mutual exchange of commodities. Since 1950 the world
trade turnover has increased by 13 times and eight rounds of multilateral trade
negotiations held under the GATT's auspices have led to a ten-fold cut of
average customs duties. At present it makes a bit less than 4 percent.
Russia's
accession to the WTO will make it possible to tap all measures existing within
the framework of this organization in order to protect Russia's economic
interests. At present direct or concealed discrimination of Russian producers
and traders on markets of certain countries is among factors affecting Russian
exports dynamics. Thus, only the ban on Russian uranium exports to the USA has
led to losses for Russia, as estimated by some experts, at $170 million a year.
The total number of anti-dumping procedures imposed upon Russia has reached 41.
More than a half of them (22) are qualified as openly discriminatory cases or
unjustified claims by the Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations.
In the summer
of 1995 the first round of negotiations between the Russian delegation and the
WTO's Working Group on Russia took place in Geneva. Members of the Working
Group apprised information on foreign trade regulations stated in the Russian
Memorandum as exhaustive enough.
An outcome of
the second round taking place from December 4 to 7 of 1995 was the completion
of discussion of the Russian Memorandum on the foreign trade regime as concerns
trade in goods. Besides, the first discussion on special annexes to the
Memorandum embracing protection of intellectual property rights, trade in
services and trade-related investment measures was held. At the same time, the
WTO member countries have reserved the right to revert to a detailed discussion
on three key issues: if state-owned trade organizations exist in Russia (Moscow
denies this); import licensing; subsidizing of external operations. However,
even now they agree in principle that the Russian legislation is in accordance
with the WTO's rules and norms in these areas of the foreign trade regulation.
There are no
apparent opponents to Russia's accession to the WTO, since the world trade,
especially in the area of trade in raw materials, cannot be regulated without
participation of Russia. However, the admission of Russia may be surrounded by
a number of additional obligations not directly following from the WTO
requirements. Bilateral consultations held in Geneva have shown that Russia
will face some complications in the course of tariff negotiations.
On the whole,
the outcome of the second round of Geneva talks has been successful for Russia.
2. Regulation of External Economic Activities
In 1995 certain
changes were introduced to the mechanism of the state regulation of the foreign
trade. In the first half of 1995 the state regulation of oil exports was
substantially amended: quotas and licenses in oil exports were abolished
alongside with preferences (with exclusion of supply pursuant to
intergovernmental agreements) while export duties on oil and oil products were
significantly reduced; certain oil products were excluded from the list of
strategically important commodities. Producers' access to channels allowing
transportation of oil to other countries (pipelines and terminals in sea ports)
became a natural restraint on exports.
The list of
strategically important raw commodities was shortened and the institution of
special exporters was abolished altogether. The system of contracts'
registration became the main instrument of control over exports. Individual
preferences granted to participants of external economic activities were
abolished, excluding those issued in accordance with the laws of the Russian
Federation.
The law
"On State Regulation of Foreign Trade" adopted in July came into
force in October. The law stipulated what authority in this area shall be with
the President, the Government and the Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations.
The exclusiveness of the MFER's position was emphasized by the fact that only
it was vested with the right to license import and export transactions subject
to quantitative restrictions or to approval procedures.
As pursuant to
the law, the Russian Government shall submit a program of foreign trade
development together with a draft of the Federal budget for the Parliament's
approval. Alongside with other provisions this program shall embrace customs
tariff rates planned for the year in question as well as the band of their
possible fluctuation, thus making the foreign trade more predictable. The
Government has the right to introduce export and import quantitative
restrictions on national security grounds, to comply with international
agreements or to protect the domestic market, however, these measures shall be
announced not less than 3 months prior to their actual introduction. The law
envisages a possibility to introduce state monopoly for trade in certain
products. In this case a special procedure of licensing import and export
operations exclusively to state-owned enterprises shall be applied.
As the above
mentioned law was effectuated, the Commission of the RF Government on Safeguard
Measures in Foreign Trade became fully legitimate and in December it received
"Procedures of Investigation Prior to Application of Safeguard Measures"
approved by the MFER (Russ.abbr. MVES). A possibility to apply safeguard
measures against competitive imported products complies with usual practices
applicable in the world trade. In this area Russia is late in working out and
application of such measures, especially taking into account that Russian
exports are often and in most cases unjustifiably subject to discrimination on
foreign markets. So, the RF import regime loses its exceptional liberalism
which has been characteristic of it until recently.
Tariff
regulation. From September through December export duties levels were gradually
lowered until their complete abolition since January 1, 1996, with an exception
of a small group of goods including oil, natural gas and some other raw
commodities.
In June and in
October, 1996 import duty rates were changed. On the whole, changes were made
in direction of an increase in tariffs. Earlier goods taxable at 1 percent have
constituted a rather significant part of the list, at present this rate is only
applicable to certain goods within Group 10 of the External Economic Activity
commodity nomenclature (grain) and 1701 (cane sugar, beet firm sugar and
sucrose). A 10 percent tariff is now applied to medicines which earlier have
been exempt from duties while fish and fish products are subject to a double
rise of duties (from 5 to 10 percent) and duties on vegetables were tripled
(from 5 to 15 percent). For foodstuffs earlier exempted from duties new tariffs
made 5 percent on bananas and citrus fruits, 10 percent on tee and coffee, 15
percent on fresh cucumbers, however, rates of import duties in Russia still
remain considerably lower than in the EU countries (16 percent against 21
percent). There were effectuated provisions stipulating a 30 percent duty on goods
such as luxuries, tobacco products, alcoholic beverages and weapons.
Tax regulation. As before,
close attention was paid to products subject to excise taxation. In July and in
December, 1996 a price difference between excise stamps and special stamps designated
for imported tobacco and alcohol products were adjusted. There were created
equal conditions for importers of these products both from countries within and
outside of the former Soviet Union (ECU 0.1 per unit of an alcohol beverage and
ECU 0.01 per unit of a tobacco product). In December the rate of excise tax on
tobacco products was increased from ECU 1.2 to ECU 2 per 1000 pieces.
In June the list of products
subject to a preferential 10 percent value added tax was shortened; it was
again examined in detail in November and some new products were added to it. In
December works and services, both produced domestically and purchased, being
exported to countries outside the CIS alongside with services concerning the
transit of foreign cargo through Russian territory were exempted from the value
added tax.
Preferences in
External Economic Activities. In October, 1996 the Government abolished previously
applicable preferential taxation of alcoholic beverages imported from abroad by
certain legal entities which were exempt from customs duties (for instance, the
National Fund of Sports and the All-Russian Society of Invalids). Since
December, pursuant to the Presidential Decree "On Customs
Preferences" of November 30, 1995, it is inadmissible for Federal agencies
to adopt decisions which would provide prolongation of preferences in terms of
customs duty exempts and receipts of additional compensations.
In August, 1996
the control mechanism over incoming export proceeds denominated in foreign
exchange was adjusted. All proceeds in foreign currencies shall be entered into
accounts with authorized banks--that became a requirement of the customs
regime. Customs service now enjoys the right to control all capital flows and
apply relevant sanctions if necessary.
In September,
1996 the control over exports and imports of military-purposed products, works
and services, subject to licensing, was tightened.
In December the
set of instruments of the state control mechanism over imports was
supplemented. The system of foreign exchange control over imports introduced on
January 1, 1996, is basing on the same principles as the export control
existing since 1994 and envisages the same chain of relations: an importer--an
authorized bank--customs. The key document fundamental for the whole control
system is a registration certificate for import transactions.
3. Foreign Trade Pattern
In 1995 Russian
foreign trade was influenced by differently directed factors. A favorable state
of the world market and the governmental policy of stimulating exports via
regular lowering of export duties provided for a further increase in volumes of
trade with countries outside the former Soviet Union and a stable active
balance of the foreign trade.
Estimating
Russian foreign trade the following adverse factors shall be taken into
account: a decline in production, small amounts of investment, rather high
inflation rates, insufficient level of state assistance for development of the
country's export potential, poor competitiveness of many Russian-made
manufactured products, especially of machines and equipment, lack of positive
shifts in development of Russia's external relations with countries of the
former CMEA, huge external debt, discriminatory barriers banning a number of
Russian-made products from external markets. In connection with accession of
Finland, Sweden and Austria to the EU Russia automatically became subject to
anti-dumping and quantitative restrictions concerning trade with these
countries in steel, textiles, mineral fertilizers, uranium.
Introduction of
the "ruble corridor (fluctuation band)" alongside with a relatively
high internal price dynamics caused deterioration of export transactions'
effectiveness. However, due to liberalization of energy resources exports, the
export sector reacted to the introduction of the "corridor" slower
and not so sharply as critics of a fixed exchange rate had believed. At the
same time, stabilization of ruble exchange rate created a sufficiently
favorable transaction climate for importers allowing them to compensate a part
of the loss inflicted by an increase in import tariffs.
Goskomstat
reports that the Russian foreign trade turnover, unorganized trade including,
made $ 135.7 billion in 1995, or by 16 percent more in comparison with 1994
figures. Exports were at $ 77.8 billion (a 18 percent increase) and imports at
$ 57.9 billion (by 15 percent more).
The results of
external economic activities in 1992 through 1995 are indicative of the fact
that Russia re-oriented its trade towards industrialized countries and that the
share of countries outside the former Soviet Union in the total foreign trade
turnover has grown. In 1995 countries outside the former USSR accounted for 78
percent of it. In 1992 through 1995 exports to these countries increased at a
record rate in the last 20 years with exports showing a 25 percent growth ($
64.3 billion) and imports (together with unorganized trade) increasing by 12
percent ($ 41.6 billion).
In 1995 growth
rates slowed down considerably. Thus, while in the first quarter exports grew
by 45 percent as compared with the same period in the last year, in the second
quarter it made only 29 percent and showed a modest 15 percent increase in the
third quarter. Undoubtedly, export growth rates were affected by the "currency
corridor (fluctuation band)" introduced in the second half of the year.
As before, the
bulk of Russian exports consists of raw materials. Fuel and energy resources
account for the biggest share (41 percent) of exports, while the
Fuel-and-Energy Complex production (oil, natural gas, oil products) becomes
more and more oriented towards external markets.
In 1995 a
decline in export growth rates in real terms was observed as natural gas
exports increased by 11 percent (14 percent in 1994), oil products grew by 8
percent (11 percent), oil--by only 1 percent (11 percent).
Growth of
exports as calculated in value terms was primarily caused by a favorable
situation on the world market. Average contract oil prices of exports in the
countries outside the former Soviet Union increased by about 7 percent as
compared with 1994 figures, natural gas exports grew by 10 percent while oil
products showed a 6.6 percent increase.
Metal exports
accounted for a 20 percent share in the Russian exports. Nickel and ferrous
metals exports grew most rapidly at 37 and 26 percent accordingly. Average
export prices of key metals surged, thus, price of nickel increased by 33.1
percent, of aluminum--by 36.9 percent, of copper--by 24.2 percent, of ferrous
alloys--by 24.7 percent, of pig iron--by 14.6 percent. The pattern of metal
exports has somewhat changed. Customs statistics reveal a growing number of
contracts on export of finished metal articles, however, their share in the
total export volumes is still insignificant. These articles are being made
according to designs of foreign companies (mostly in aircraft and engineering
industries) under a binding condition that they shall be manufactured in
accordance with the West European standards and certified by a foreign firm. It
is too early to suggest the end of an age of raw exports conducted in their
most primitive form, however, the Russian metal industry is given an
opportunity to participate in the international division of labor on equal
basis and to reach a qualitatively new level of production.
The share of
chemicals made 9.6 percent. Mineral fertilizers still remain a key export item
in the industry. Export volumes of mineral fertilizers increased by 14 percent
in comparison with 1994 figures. Simultaneously, average contract prices also
grew (by 24 percent).
Export patterns
within the forestry and paper industry tended to be oriented towards raw
materials in recent years affecting the structure of currency proceeds
accordingly. A third of foreign exchange proceeds was derived from raw timber
(logs) exports while semi-finished timber (lumber) accounted for 25 percent of
proceeds and processing-intensive products brought only 32 percent.
A considerable
increase in physical volumes of exports in the countries outside the former
Soviet Union as compared with the previous year figures was reported for logs
(37 percent) and cellulose (38 percent). At the same time, average export
prices of logs grew by 2.8 percent and of cellulose -- by 96.6 percent.
One of the ways
to increase export revenues is an expansion of sales markets for Russian-made
weapons and military equipment. Export volumes of military production made $
2.6 billion in 1995, that being by 1.7 times more than in 1994.
The share of machines and equipment
in Russian exports to countries outside the former Soviet Union contracted to
3.8 percent as compared with 5.3 percent in 1994. Development of new
competitive and technologically-intensive products relevant to modern level of
requirements on external markets demands large investment and is
time-consuming.
Table 5.2
Volumes of Russian Foreign Trade with Countries Outside Former Soviet Union in
Value Terms (without unorganized trade, US$ billions)
Source:
Ministry of Economy of RF. 1992 1993 1994 1995 $ billion In % to previous year $ billion In % to previous year $ billion In % to previous year $ billion In % to previous year Foreign trade turnover 79.4 83.2 71.1 89.5 79.8 112.2 97.6 122.3 Exports 42.4 83.3 44.3 104.5 51.5 116.1 64.3 125.1 Imports 37.0 83.1 26.8 72.4 28.3 105.7 33.3 117.4 Balance 5.4 87.1 17.5 324.0 23.2 132.0 31.0 133.0
An increase in
internal productional costs, first of all at the expense of energy and raw
materials, more expensive loans, growing transport expenses, aging production
assets in extractive and processing branches, deteriorating productional
situation contributed to diminishing effectiveness of export transactions. At
present only export of natural gas, oil, nickel, timber and lumber are
profitable. Export of oil products, ferrous and nonferrous metals, chemicals
begins to bring losses. However, due to worsening financial situation of
Russian enterprises and growing payment arrears exporters prefer to have hard
currencies even at declining or altogether negative profitability of exports.
The most
dynamic and growing market of the Russian Federation are industrialized Western
countries. The largest share of Russian exports goes to Germany (9.1 percent).
The USA account for 6.9 percent, Switzerland--for 5.8 percent, Italy--for 5.6
percent, Japan--for 5.5 percent, Netherlands -- for 4.9 percent, Great Britain
-- for 4.7 percent and Finland--for 4 percent of Russian exports.
The pattern of
Russian imports has not been changed considerably. As before, machines and
equipment were ranked first and accounted for a 38 percent share of the total
imports which grew by 23 percent in comparison with 1994. It was caused by a
necessity to provide key branches of the national economy with modern
technologies and equipment.
A decline in
agriculture followed by deteriorating provision of the populace with
domestic-made foodstuffs has led to an expansion of food imports. Such measures
as a rise of import duty rates, introduction of excises and of value added tax,
abolition of preferences concerning import tariffs, which have been taken
lately, contributed to an increase in internal prices of imported goods thus
creating prerequisites to restrain imports. However, stabilization of ruble
somewhat compensated for the negative impact of growing import duties and
excises and helped to increase imports.
In 1995 imports
grew considerably, especially of such products as sunflower oil (a 232 percent
increase), poultry (by 70 percent more), alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages
(a 67 percent increase), butter (an increase by 65 percent), frozen meat (by 43
percent more).
In the nearest
future dynamics and pattern of the country's foreign trade will be first of all
determined by the internal economic situation, i.e. whether it shows signs of
business revival or not, by changes in the structure of supply and solvent
demand on the domestic market, as well as by exchange rate policies. The
regulatory mechanism of the external economic activities may also change due to
political factors.
In 1996 exports
grew somewhat slower (at about 1--3 percent rates). It was expected that export
of major fuel and energy resources would remain at the same level while such
products as metals, chemicals, timber, pulp and paper would be exported in
increasing quantities.
Oil and natural
gas exports remained profitable because estimated rates of internal price
growth prevailed.
Imports pattern
changed impacted by a growth of the share of technological equipment and
manufactured consumer goods. Growing imports of key foodstuffs and non-food
consumer goods led to application of certain measures aimed to tighten
protectionist regime in order to safeguard domestic industries in 1996 (import
quotas introduced).
In 1995 Russian
foreign trade turnover with the CIS countries made $ 29.8 billion, increasing
by 5 percent in comparison with 1994 figures, it is due, first of all, to a
price rise concerning fuel and energy products (14 -- 28 percent on the
average). Exports made $ 13.5 billion, or by 9 percent less than in 1994 while
imports reached $ 16.3 billion (a 21 percent increase). The share of the CIS
countries in the Russian foreign trade turnover diminished by 2 percent as
compared with the previous year figures and made 22 percent.
For the first
time in the years of the CIS existence Russia had a negative trade balance with
these countries ($ -2.8 billion) while in 1994 it had a trade surplus of $ 1.2
billion. Starting from the end of the last year imports from the CIS grew at a
fast rate while exports gradually shrank.
The main reason
determining the import surplus is an unbalanced, owning to a crisis situation
existing in national economies, foreign trade within the CIS framework, that
rendering difficulties in settlement of the CIS countries debts, especially
those due for fuel and energy resources supply. According to current data,
these debts as of January 1, 1996, made Rb 15.6 trillion, or two times more
than in 1995. It is hardly justified to attribute Russian shrinking exports to
neighboring countries to introduction of the "currency corridor (fluctuation
band)" as their fall began as early as April while to the contrary in
October some increase in export operations was observed. On the other hand,
introduction of the "currency corridor (fluctuation band)" and
stabilization of ruble exchange rates enhanced effectiveness of operations of
exporters from countries within the former Soviet Union on the Russian market.
As before, the
fuel and energy products accounted for the bulk of exports to the CIS member
countries (about 50 percent). Total volumes of oil exports diminished by 22
percent as compared with the previous year while export of oil products shrank
even more considerably -- by 60 percent, the fact caused not only by payment
arrears in reciprocal transactions, but by growing export prices of Russian oil
which increased by 28.3 percent in comparison with the last year figures and
reached $ 74.9 per metric ton (that making roughly 70 percent of prices under
export contracts with countries outside the former Soviet Union). However, now
some CIS countries try to reduce their dependence on Russian energy supply. For
instance, Moldavia has already signed an oil import agreement with Iran while
Ukraine relies upon cooperation with countries of the Persian Gulf. At the same
time, Russian oil exports to Byelorussia grew considerably as a result of
creation of the common customs area, that allowing Byelorussian oil processing
enterprises to purchase oil at prices quoted on the Russian domestic market.
The pattern of
Russian exports somewhat changed in 1995 as compared with 1994, for instance
coal exports grew by 32 percent, iron ore exports increased twofold and export
of ferrous metals also showed signs of growth.
As concerns
import operations, the role of the CIS member countries remains an important
one in terms of providing Russia with foodstuffs. Thus, the share of white
sugar imports from these countries reached 80 percent while their volumes
increased by more than two times since the last year. There was also observed
an increase in imports of grain, meat, butter. At the same time, a trend to
purchase fewer consumer goods in countries within the former Soviet Union in
connection to availability of cheaper similar products of quality made in the
West manifests itself.
The Customs
Union of Russia, Byelorussia and Kazakhstan which was established in 1995 and
faces a number of objective difficulties and contradictions caused in the first
turn by differences in levels of development and directions of reforms. The
Intergovernmental Economic Committee which at last started to perform its
functions in 1995 still lacks supranational authority; unsettled problems of
mutual payment arrears prevent activities of the Payment Union.
Prospects of
foreign trade developments within the CIS cannot be estimated in simple terms.
The Commonwealth's objective orientation towards integration faces grave
political and economic problems. It is probable that in the beginning of next
year a negative trade balance with neighboring countries will remain, in
particular due to further decline in export of fuel and energy products.
On the whole,
the Commonwealth's future, undoubtedly, will depend on the political situation
in Russia. However, the experience of the last few years demonstrates that
Russia's partners within the CIS prefer to act according to their economic
interests rather than to political rhetorics. The CIS member countries are
interested in an economic cooperation with Russia exactly because it has
progressed relatively further on the way of reforms. That is why slackening
pace of the reform or a complete stop of the transformation may damage trends
towards integration to such extent that any political declarations on closer
unity and cooperation will be overweighed.
Balance of Payments
The balance of
payments reflecting Russian residents' activities in the external sector
reveals the following key facts.
In 1995, the
strengthening ruble did not hold back the growth of trade surplus: exports
increased at a greater rate than imports.
As during
previous periods import of services exceeded their exports, that being
primarily attributed to developing tourism to countries outside the former
Soviet Union. Thus, import of tourist services exceeded imports by $ 5366
million. As a result, current accounts balance was by 43 percent less than the
balance of foreign trade. Operations of governmental agencies prevailed in the
capital account. External debt grew due both to new borrowing and deferments
and arrears in debt servicing.
Non-state
sector operations were mostly represented by commercial loans, both in terms of
merchandise exports with deferred payments and advance payments. As concerns
direct and portfolio investment, they remained at an insignificant level.
Growing
reliance of residents on ruble was shown by somewhat decreasing amounts of cash
foreign exchange.
As a rule,
commercial structures accounted for loans granted to non-residents. The main
form of such loans was export loans of enterprises.
Non-repatriation
of export proceeds became an important factor destabilizing the financial
sphere. In January through September of 1995 it reached $ 5.6 billion, as the
State Customs Committee (GTK) reports. This figure is comparable to all foreign
loans drawn by the state in the same period.
The amount of
payments due to disburse the official external debt exerted more pressure on
the Federal budget as compared with the same period of the last year. While in
9 months of 1994 96 percent of actual payments to disburse the official
external debt were financed at the expense of external sources and only $ 134
million were received from internal sources, in 9 months of 1995 the figures
made 89.5 percent and $ 590 million accordingly.
